Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Gladwell/"What the Dog Saw"

Dogs follow humans. They need some kind of direction to function well. However, if the human is lacking direction, they cannot possibly hope to control a dog. Dogs see right through to our emotions. If they see that we are struggling, they’ll take advantage. Likewise, when we humans are unstable, other humans can usually tell, and that affects our judgment of a person. If someone is uncomfortable with something, we are less likely to want him or her to do that thing.

Gladwell argues that we need to try to understand each other by entering each other’s worlds. Only then can we learn what someone is really about. “Exercise, discipline and affection” are what we should, according to Gladwell, strive for in understanding others. An action is taken and it is either corrected or praised. We (should) raise children like this, and train animals like this. If we cannot do this, it is pretty much useless to attempt to communicate effectively with others.

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your overall take on the article is basically a mirror-image of my own. I think we often forget how we come across to others, and as Gladwell argues, presence is everything. Our presence affects how people and animals in fact treat us. For example, when a person's dog takes total control of them by acting out all the time, it's because that dog can sense their fear or lack of care, and feed off of it. Likewise, if the situation was with a person approaching another person...We can't expect a mentally disabled child to listen to us if we are looking down upon them. We must meet at an equal level of agreement and go on from there. Much like what you are saying in that, "we must enter each others worlds," to be able to communicate effectively.

    ReplyDelete